Associate or set up your Google account with the emulator.I'm still on Mojave so that I can continue to use the 32-bit native Mac version of BeebEm (BeebEm4), which, as I've said many times before, is still the easiest way on a Mac to quickly launch and test a. How to Download and Install River Raid for PC or MAC: Open the emulator software from the start menu or desktop shortcut in your PC. TikTok is your new video social network, prepared exclusively to boost your creativity and offer other people the possibility to get inspired by your singing, dancing and performing skills.Finally, download and install the emulator which will work well with your PCs hardware/software. Play TikTok on PC and Mac with BlueStacks and feel free to share whatever you want to with other users, in a quick and easy way.OS X Yosemite Simulator by tycoonjoe.BeebEm5 is still under development and isn't quite ready for regular use, I don't think. OS X El Capitan Simulator 2 by Jethrochannz. OS X Yosemite Simulator remix by ZAWSZEANONIM. OS X Yosemite X Kirby Simulator by honnybean. Mac OS X 10.7 by PigVenomPV. Mac OS X Sierra (10.12.0) by -Apple-Inc.And I have a Windows laptop I can always fire up which runs BeebEm too (and, of course, the real thing in the loft, fully working, complete with Datacentre, TurboMMB and yet to be installed Gotek.and two floppy drives). Also, b2 still doesn't emulate the 8271 floppy disc controller - or tape!It's not an ideal state of affairs for Mac users who want to emulate Beebs!I'm not that bothered about BeebEm not working fully - it works far enough to try out SSDs, DSDs and ADFs. But I've always found the interface for b2 a bit fiddly and un-Mac-like, and I don't know how easy it is to do quick launch-and-tests of. I'll have to try switching to b2, which I think is the only native 64-bit Beeb emulator for Mac (apart from the still-under-construction BeebEm5). If I upgrade my current version of macOS or get a new Mac that can't run 32-bit Mac BeebEm (as no modern Macs can) I don't really know what my emulator setup will be. RPCS3 Sony PlayStation 3 Emulator for Windows 32-bit/64-bit.Eventually I'll have to abandon Mojave.What really got me was Office (yes, Microsoft Office) joining them in requiring a newer OS than High Sierra.On the High Sierra subject - has anyone, who has this, got a AppStore Upgrade tab where the formatting has been totally mucked up? Both this mac, and my wife's MacBook Air (also on HS) have the same display. That I should upgrade the OS to get the latest versions. It's still sitting in my Applications, but has now been joined by Catalina install (which was oddly much smaller - must just be the installer, while Mojave is the entire OS).My main gripe is the nagging screens from Keynote, Numbers, Pages, etc.
Commodore 64 Emulator El Sierra Free To ShareUnexpectedly, so did DiskImagery64 (a D64 editor for Commodore images), DFSExplorer and ADFSExplorer also needed to go - but no problem there as I've written a replacement for all three. It upgraded to Catalina, then found it had a further update to do, so that was another half an hour.As expected, BeebEm4, Arculator, and FS-UAE had to be removed. Took a couple of hours, so I just left it to it. And another thing Apple refuse to admit is that High Sierra doesn't seem to handle a 5GHz WiFi signal very well.despite me telling them this is so, with both machines displaying the same behaviour (the MBA can't go above HS, which is annoying in some respects).Well the deed is done. My Mac's on Catalina (as mentioned before – against my wishes!) and there's a Garage Band update sitting in my App Store upgrades page that offers itself for installation but then refuses to download and install when I try to do so, because it needs Big Sur. Anyway, back to my book.A few assorted points in response to things I've just read here:Don't make the mistake of thinking that Catalina will banish your app update problems. I'll give dark mode a go in the next couple of days. I've also had to re-enable allowing applications from anywhere to run - that's just a simple command to run in Terminal.I don't like the new colour scheme for the dock or the title bar, but I'm on light mode. So, nothing I'll miss in a hurry or I don't have alternatives for.OneDrive seems to no longer have permissions to access some files, which is odd, and I've yet to check to see if my Raspberry Pi can still connect (both from Raspbian OS and RISC OS).What I still need to do is I've got to re-configure and set up again my web server I had running on High Sierra. Commview for wifi crackThe default light greys of the RISC OS desktop actually work ideally well). Yes, it's true that an overall darker screen is less tiring on the eyes (e.g. Yes, it's true that the Mac's interface has always been excessively white and glaring (though it was much worse in classic Mac OS days). There are people who are similarly obsessed with getting a Dark Mode for RISC OS too, which is just bonkers. I do not understand why folk are so obsessed with the gimmick that is Dark Mode these days, and hope the phase will soon pass. Also, there are plenty of other third party apps that I also can't get in their latest versions (though they don't clog up my update page like Garage Band does).Personal rant. And this is far more tiring on the eyes (constantly having to adjust between bright and too-dark areas) than is using a screen over which the brightness is evenly distributed.So do yourself a favour and ignore Dark Mode it's a totally misguided concept that people seem to think is cool, but which actually does much more harm than good. Buttons, interface elements etc.) that are defined using dark shades are much harder to discern than ones that use lighter shades, so you'll have to strain your eyes and stare to see them and(b) especially when using an editor and working on a page (which will invariably be represented by a bright white – or, at least, brightly colourful – artwork area, the contrast between bright page and dark UI controls will be massive. Although I could expound on this for ages, it boils down to two crucial and undeniable points:(a) controls (i.e. But as a so-called user interface 'improvement' it's completely misguided. It reminds me very much of how things were when Acorn introduced the Archimedes back in 1987: it may or may not be well remembered that there was a time when Acorn's PC Emulator software could emulate a PC faster than the equivalent real-hardware PC would run. The cheapest, fanless model) compared with basically any Windows laptop you can buy. Although I don't yet have an Apple Silicon Mac myself, I've been following them with much interest, and the recent revelation that's been blowing a lot of people's minds is the sheer power you get out of a sub-£1K MacBook Air (i.e. Macs are now the fastest Windows PCs on the marketApple Silicon does raise very interesting questions. Your eyes will thank you for it.3. And that's before you even consider the massively superior battery life, the absence of fan noise, the lower temperatures, the nicer trackpad etc. For raw processor power (and surprisingly good graphics performance), even with the overheads of running Parallels Desktop, it's clear that Apple Silicon outperforms Intel to a sufficient degree that a Mac running Windows 10 for ARM under Parallels Desktop is actually the fastest Windows PC you can buy for now. You can no longer install only Windows on an Apple Silicon Mac, as Apple has kept Boot Camp an Intel-only feature, but given how well Parallels Desktop works, why would you want to? It's true that gaming PC laptops with really high-end graphics cards will be able to outperform Apple Silicon MacBooks in terms of graphics performance, but that's for high-end games and the sorts of demanding graphics applications that most users don't need. As Crossover is $10 whereas Parallels is £70 plus a Windows license, I know which of those I would prefer! So, any reports from anyone about successfully using Crossover to run Windows versions of things no longer available on 64 bit macOS would be very welcome. They're actually amazing value and perform incredibly, both in terms of computing power and efficiency/battery life (as you'd expect from ARM).Interesting outcome. I'm not trying to be an Apple advert here I'm just pointing out the facts that I've seen (both in print and demonstrated in YouTube videos) recently, in case people reading this hadn't realised how well these new Macs work as PCs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorMargaret ArchivesCategories |